[Federal Register: May 1, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 84)]
[Notices]
[Page 21731-21732]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Garnet Stars & Sands Project; Idaho Panhandle National Forests,
Benewah and Latah Counties, Idaho
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The St. Joe Ranger District of the Idaho Panhandle National
Forests is beginning an analysis and preparation of an environmental
Impact Statement to address recreational digging, leasing and/or sale
of the garnet resource in the Emerald, Hidden, Wood and Cat Spur Creek
drainages. The responsible official is Forest Supervisor, Idaho
Panhandle National Forests, 3815 Schreiber Way, Coeur d' Alene, ID
83815.
The garnet resource consists of both sands and gemstones. The sands
are used for industrial purposes, primarily as abrasives. The Project
Area produces extraordinary quality and quantity of large garnets, with
some of the drainages producing star garnets. These gemstones are use
commercially for jewelry and are sought after by recreationists.
Much of the Emerald Creek drainage, on public and private lands,
has been mined in the past. Two lease renewals, one new lease
application, one prospecting permit extension, and eight new
prospecting permit applications have been submitted. In addition, the
Forest Service currently manages a public digging areas (by fee permit)
in 281 Gulch, a tributary to Emerald Creek.
The Purpose and Need for this project is based in the fact that the
garnet resource is finite and valuable and there is considerable public
interest in leasing of gemstones and sands and retaining the
recreational digging area. The Purpose and Need for this project is as
follows:
Respond to public interest in developing the mineral
resource, while conserving the garnet resource for future generations.
Gemstone deposits within the current Forest Service
recreational digging area in 281 Gulch are becoming depleted. If the
Forest Service is going to continue to provide this unique recreational
digging opportunity, other areas need to be tested, identified and
developed.
Resolve twelve pending mining applications or extensions
(lease applications, permit applications and permit extensions) for
both garnets and sand, dating back to 1996.
DATES: The Draft Environmental Impact Statement is expected to be filed
by October 1, 2001. The Final Environmental Impact Statement is
expected to be filed by June 30, 2001.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to: Garnet Stars & Sands, St. Joe
Ranger District, PO Box 407, St. Maries, ID 83861.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions should be referred to Tracy
Gravelle, St. Joe Ranger District, Avery Office, HC Box 1, Avery, ID
83861.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Action
Public Recreational Gemstone Digging Areas
(1) The Forest Service would reserve Wood Creek and certain
tributaries of the East Fork of Emerald Creek (281 Gulch, Garnet Gulch,
No Name, PeeWee and Strom Creeks) and for public recreational digging
of gemstone garnets. These areas would not be available for commercial
lease.
These drainages would be tested with a combination of auger holes,
hand or machine-dug trenches. After testing, drainages will be listed
in order of priority for development. Each drainage would require
different development. The following activities are likely:
Only one drainage at a time would be open.
All site may have trees cut and removed and/or used for
reclamation.
An average of 200-300 feet per year would be opened and reclaimed
according to design features in Chapter 2 of the EIS.
Reclamation will follow Best Management Practices and include site-
specific mitigations that will be developed for this analysis.
Details by Drainage
281 Gulch: Progressive digging would continue in the two forks to
the confluence of the East and West Forks. Digging would then continue
on the main fork of 281 to Road 447. Overburden removal would be
needed.
Garnet Gulch: The original parking area for Pee Wee and NoName
creeks would be used for this drainage. The a-frame would be located at
the parking area and a toilet facility installed. An estimated \1/2\
mile trail would be constructed. Some overburden removal may be
necessary.
PeeWee and No Name Creeks: These drainages have been recreational
digging areas previously and are known to have high quality gemstones.
At the time, there was no equipment brought in to remove overburden and
it is believed that there may be more resource available. Development
would include a toilet facility but the parking and other site space
still exist. These two areas shared parking areas. Overburden removal
is likely going to be necessary.
Strom Gulch: Parking, the a-frame and toilet may be developed on
the upper road (Rd. 1487) or this site would utilize the facilities for
Pee Wee and NoName Creeks. No overburden removal is expected.
Wood Creek: parking and a site for the a-frame and toilet would be
developed. Some overburden removal may be necessary.
Lease Application
(2) The pending lease application (ID 29529) for gemstones on
Bechtel Butte would be approved. This entails the following: 5 to 6
pits 15 feet in diameter; one backhoe trench 100 feet long by 20 feet
wide and 8 feet deep on the ridge; a bobcat excavator would be used to
fill in and dig smaller trenches (T42N, R1E, Sections 9, 10, 15 & 16).
It is expected that these activities would begin in 2002 and continue
through 2007.
Prospecting Permits
Prospecting permits also suggest that there could be further
development applied for in the form of a lease application. In order to
perform an efficient analysis, for some of the permits we are assuming
subsequent
[[Page 21732]]
development as long as analysis shows that it can be done within
relevant laws and regulations. When or if a lease application is filed,
then another NEPA decision would be required but it is likely that much
of the pre-work would be complete with this document.
(3) The ending prospecting permit applications (ID 31439, 31440,
31441, 31442, 31443, 31444) and prospecting permit extension (ID 29619)
would be approved. Specifically this entails three backhoe trenches.
For the area under these permits, ID 31439-31444 and 29619, the
following subsequent development is assumed:
National Forest lands along the East and West Forks of Emerald
Creek would be developed for mining garnet sands. This would include
the wider and more accessible portions of the East Fork from the west
line of T24N, R1E, Section 18 (between Flat Creek and Strom Gulch) to
near the confluence of the East and West Forks of Emerald Creek. Some
portions of Road 447 would be removed for mining and replaced
afterward, which would result in a temporary re-route around mining
operations. Some portions of the creek channel would be temporarily
relocated for mining and then rebuilt. A similar mining scenario would
take place in the West Fork on approximately 25 acres (\1/2\) mile of
stream). The West Fork operations would begin at the upstream end and
take two summer seasons beginning in the year 2003. The East Fork
operations would begin at the upstream end of the creek and would last
for a total of 7-10 years starting in the year 2003. West Fork
location: T43N, R1E, Section 33 and T42N, R1E, Section 4. East Fork
locations: T24N, R1W, Sections 13 and 14; T42N, R1E, Sections 3, 8, 9,
17, and 18.
Other areas would be explored for possible future mining
development. However, the probability of mining activity here is less
certain and will not be analyzed at this time. Any development of these
drainages would likely be applied for after the mining in the East and
West Forks is complete.
(4) The pending prospecting permit application (ID 33036/amended
application (4/2/2001)) for garnet gemstones would be approved. This
entails hand-dug trenches in a tributary to Cat Spur Creek. No
assumptions for further development will be made at this time. (T42N,
R2E, Section 19).
(5) The pending prospecting permit application (ID 32421) for
garnet sands on Bechtel Butte would be approved. This entails three
hand-dug trenches 10 ft. x 12 ft. (T42N, R1E, Sections 9, 10, 15,
16).
Lease Renewal
(6) The pending lease renewal applications (ID 016415 & 25554)
would be approved. This would include development and mining for garnet
sands on approximately 8.0 acres in Section 9 on the East Fork of
Emerald Creek; these operations would likely occur in the last third of
the 7-10 year mining period for mining the East Fork. The remaining
areas of the lease have already been mined and reclaimed. (T42N, R1E,
Section 9).
Conditions & Reclamation
(7) The conditions and reclamation requirements under which any
recreational and commercial garnet mining could be implemented would be
developed.
Forest Plan Amendment and Other Agency Permits
It is possible that this proposal would require a non-significant
Forest Plan amendment regarding mining development.
The proposed action allows for commercial leasing of gemstones and
sands, which requires permit approval and implementation by the Bureau
of Land Management. Project implementation with floodplains would
require Corps of Engineers Permits (404 permits).
Issues
We expect that maintaining fish and water quality will be issues of
primary importance. Also, we expect that whether or not to maintain
recreational digging areas is likely to be an issue. Other issues will
be developed during this scoping period. A likely alternative to the
proposed action could be to allow recreational digging only and not
allow commercial leasing of gemstone garnets.
Public Involvement
A scoping letter has been sent to addresses on the mailing list in
addition to outreach to rockhound groups and other interested parties.
While public participation is welcome at any time, comments received
during the 30-day scoping comment period will be especially useful in
preparation of the Draft EIS. News releases have been sent out to the
local and major newspapers in northern Idaho. This project is also
listed on the Idaho Panhandled National Forest web site (www.fs.fed.us/
ipnf); pertinent documents will be displayed on this site. In addition,
the comment period on the draft environmental impact statement will be
45 days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes the
notice of availability in the Federal Register. It is the reviewer's
obligation to comment during the scoping and/or DEIS review.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
533 (1973). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the
draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may
be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Amgoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings,
it is very important that those interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45-day comment period so that
substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest
Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to
them in the final environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is
also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the
draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft
environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Dated: April 16, 2001.
Pat Aguilar,
Acting Forest Supervisor, Idaho Panhandle National Forests.
[FR Doc. 01-10812 Filed 4-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 2001/05/01 EST