[Federal Register: May 8, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 89)]
[Notices]
[Page 30865-30866]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08my02-49]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Leon, Liberty, Wakulla, Franklin, Columbia, Baker, Lake, Putnam
and Marion Counties, FL
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare a draft environmental impact
statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service intends to prepare a draft
environmental impact statement for designating a system of roads and
trails within portions of the Apalachicola, Osceola, and Ocala National
Forests in Florida.
DATES: A draft environmental impact statement is expected to be
completed in August 2002. The final environmental impact statement is
scheduled to be completed in November 2002.
ADDRESSES: You may request to be placed on the project mailing list and
submit comments by contacting: Marsha Kearney, Forest Supervisor, USDA
Forest Service, 325 John Knox Rd., Tallahassee, Florida, 32303.
[[Page 30866]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andy Colaninno, District Ranger,
Apalalachicola Ranger District, PO Box 579, Bristol, Florida 32321;
Jerri Marr, District Ranger, Lake George Ranger District, 17147 Highway
40, Silver Springs, Florida 34488; Jim Thorsen, District Ranger,
Seminole Ranger District, 40929 State Road 19, Umatilla, Florida 32784;
Will Metz, District Ranger, Osceola Ranger District, PO Box 70,
Olustee, Florida 32072.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Prior to 1999, vehicles could travel off
roads (cross-country) on the National Forests in Florida except in
areas specifically posted closed. The policy of allowing cross-country
access contributed to a proliferation of travelways in portions of the
Forests. As a result of this situation, vehicle access was addressed in
the revision of Land and Resource Management Plan for the National
Forests in Florida (Forest Plan).
Upon approval in 1999, the Forest Plan changed access for motorized
vehicles in two ways: ``cross-country'' travel on land with no existing
roads or trails is prohibited anywhere in the forests; and restricted
areas were established where travel will be limited to designated roads
and trails. The Forest Plan provided that a system of roads and trails
would be designated in the restricted areas in cooperation with the
public and user groups.
In January 2000 a series of public meetings was held near each
National Forest in Florida. At these meetings, attendees selected a
variety of stakeholder representatives to provide information on access
preferences and needs. The group developed a proposed system for
consideration by the Forest Service along with a set of guiding
principles and designation criteria. The Forest Service began an
environmental assessment of the proposed action in 2001. During the
assessment, it became evident that an accurate inventory of roads,
trails, and travelways was needed in the restricted areas. An inventory
using the global positioning system (GPS) began in August 2001 and was
completed in April 2002. It also became evident that the proposed
action may have a significant effect on the human environment leading
to preparation of an environmental impact statement.
The scoping process, as outlined by the Council on Environmental
Quality (CEQ), will be utilized to involve Federal, State, and local
agencies and other interested persons and organizations. Interested
persons and organizations wishing to participate in the scoping process
should contact the Forest Service at the above mentioned address.
Environmental considerations include potential presence of historical
or archeological resources, aesthetics, recreation demand, wetlands,
endangered and threatened species, and fish and wildlife habitats and
values. The comment period on the draft environmental impact statement
will be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the Notice of Availability in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the
draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may
be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings,
it is very important that those interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made available to the Forest Service at a
time when it can meaningful consider them and respond to them in the
final environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is
also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the
draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft
environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the CEQ for implementing the procedural provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Dated: May 2, 2002.
Marsha Kearney,
Forest Supervisor, National Forests in Florida.
[FR Doc. 02-11354 Filed 5-7-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 2002/05/08 EST