[Federal Register: May 26, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 103)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 34042-34047]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26my00-3]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Utilities Service
7 CFR Part 1728
Specifications and Drawings for Underground Electric Distribution
AGENCY: Rural Utilities Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Rural Utilities Service (RUS) is revising its regulations
on Specifications and Drawings for Underground Electric Distribution,
RUS Bulletin 50-6. This bulletin is currently incorporated by reference
in RUS regulations and, will continue to be incorporated by reference.
This revision is necessary to provide RUS electric borrowers with the
latest specifications for constructing their rural underground electric
distribution systems using state-of-art materials, equipment, and
construction methods. RUS is renumbering and reformating the revised
bulletin in accordance with the agency's new publications and
directives system.
DATES: Effective Date: June 26, 2000.
Incorporation by Reference: IBR approved by the Director, Office of
the Federal Register, June 26, 2000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Trung V. Hiu, Electrical Engineer,
Distribution Branch, Electric Staff
[[Page 34043]]
Division, Rural Utilities Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW, STOP 1569, Washington, DC 20250-1569.
Telephone: (202) 720-1877. Fax: (202) 720-7491.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by Office
of Management and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 12372
This rule is excluded from the scope of Executive Order 12372,
Intergovernmental Consultation, which may require consultation with
State and local officials. See the final rule related notice entitled
``Department Programs and Activities Excluded from Executive Order
12372'' (50 FR 47034).
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. RUS has determined that this rule meets the applicable
standards provided in section 3 of the Executive Order. In accordance
with the Executive Order and the rule: (1) All State and local laws and
regulations that are in conflict with this rule will be preempted; (2)
no retroactive effect will be given to this rule; and (3) in accordance
with Sec. 212(e) of the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of
1994 (7 U.S.C. 6912(e)), administrative appeal procedures, if any, are
required, must be exhausted prior to initiating litigation against the
Department or its agencies.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
The Administrator of RUS has determined that a rule relating to the
RUS electric loan program is not a rule as defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) and, therefore, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act does not apply to this rule. RUS borrowers, as a result
of obtaining Federal financing, receive economic benefits that exceed
any direct economic costs associated with complying with RUS
regulations and requirements.
Information Collection and Recordkeeping Requirements
This rule contains no reporting or recordkeeping provisions
requiring Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
National Environmental Policy Act Certification
The Administrator of RUS has determined that this rule will not
significantly affect the quality of the human environment as defined by
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)
Therefore, this action does not require an environmental impact
statement or assessment.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The program described by this rule is listed in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance Programs under No. 10.850, Rural
Electrification Loans and Loan Guarantees. This catalog is available on
a subscription basis from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.
Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325. Telephone: (202)
512-1800.
Unfunded Mandates
This final rule contains no Federal mandates (under the regulatory
provision of Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995) for
State, local, and tribal governments or the private sector. Thus, this
rule is not subject to the requirements of section 202 and 205 of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Background
Pursuant to the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 (7 U.S.C. 901 et
seq.), the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) is amending 7 CFR Chapter
XVII, Part 1728, Electric Standards and Specification for Materials and
Construction, by revising RUS Bulletin 50-6 (D-806), Specification and
Drawings for Underground Electric Distribution. This revised bulletin
is renumbered as RUS Bulletin 1728F-806. RUS maintains a system of
bulletins that contains construction standards and specifications for
materials and equipment which must be complied with when system
facilities are constructed by RUS electric and telecommunications
borrowers in accordance with the RUS loan contract. These standards and
specifications contain standard construction units, material, and
equipment units commonly used in RUS electric and telecommunications
borrowers' systems.
RUS Bulletin 50-6 provides standard underground electric
distribution construction drawings and specifications of 12.5/7.2 kV
and 24.9/14.4 kV underground electric distribution lines. RUS is
changing the bulletin number from RUS Bulletin 50-6 to RUS Bulletin
1728F-806. The change in the bulletin number and reformatting is
necessary to conform to RUS new publications and directives system.
This rule incorporates the bulletin by reference in 7 CFR part 1728.97.
Major changes in the bulletin are described below:
(1) Two new drawings, UC2-1 and UC2-2, have been added as
alternative construction to existing drawing UC2.
(2) RUS has determined that the URD INSPECTION FORM and 23 drawings
are no longer practical. Therefore, RUS has removed the following
drawings: UC3, UC4, UG9A, UG23, UM3-47, UM3-48, UM8-3, UM12-1, UM12-2,
UM-26, UM50, UX8 through UX10, and UX12 through UX26.
(3) Some of the specifications cited in the bulletin preface have
been altered to comply with the latest codes and regulations and to
improve field construction.
(4) The titles of the drawings in the Index of Drawings have been
modified to have better descriptions.
Approximately 60 drawings have been revised with one or more of the
following changes:
(1) Clearance distance B has been changed to be the distance
between open vertical conductors (outer edge nearest to pole) and pole
center in accordance to the latest codes.
(2) A B MINIMUM table has been added to appropriate drawings to
show proper clearances corresponding to different voltages.
(3) Ground rods have been redrawn to proper grade.
(4) The installation of CAUTION, WARNING, and DANGER signs has been
changed to meet the latest codes.
(5) In the material tables, item U hw, CAUTION sign, has been
changed to WARNING sign.
(6) In the material tables, item U hp, elbow termination, has been
added.
(7) Ground wires between ground rods and connectors have been
redrawn as dotted lines.
(8) In boxes labeled B MINIMUM, the v in kv has been capitalized.
(9) Some notes below the DESIGNATE AS headings have been deleted
where appropriate.
(10) In the material tables, (load break type) has been removed
from item af, cutout descriptions.
(11) Several conductor routes have been redrawn for easier
construction and increased performance.
(12) Devices, such as surge arresters, have been redrawn and
relocated to reflect the improved designs and to meet the latest
construction practices and safety codes.
(13) Crossarms, penta-head bolts, one-line diagrams, grounding
pads, and pin
[[Page 34044]]
insulators have been added to certain drawings where appropriate.
(14) Blowups have been added to several drawings to emphasize
details.
(15) The notes on some drawings have been revised to remove
ambiguity and to meet the latest safety codes and construction
standards.
On April 8, 1998, RUS published a proposed rule in the Federal
Register, at 63 FR 17128. RUS received numerous comments from several
cooperatives and interested individuals. The followings are the
submitted comments and RUS responses:
(1) Set all pad-mounted equipment on concrete vaults. The
reinforcing steel in the base is tied to the ground rod. Tests have
shown this scheme to provide a very good ground.
Response: RUS disagrees as this practice may not be practical and
may not significantly improve grounding in most cases.
(2) Section 7.4: Requires ``mechanical tamp for only 36 inches from
major units''--suggests no tamping requirement for the remainder of the
trench. Is that the intent?
Response: No. The 36 inches (0.9 meters) is mandatory and is a
minimum requirement.
(3) Section 7.5: Does the term ``hole'' refer to ground sleeve, or
vault? Should RUS change this term?
Response: Section 7.5 has been removed. This practice is not
recommended by RUS.
(4) Section 11.2: The ``not more than one splice per 2,000 feet''
is not practical if conduits and ground sleeves are involved. Splice
location markings can be helpful, but not needed as a ``must''.
Response: RUS allows the borrower the option to specify. RUS
intention is to limit the number of splices of multi (``scrap'')
cables.
(5) Section 12.1: Would RUS consider reseal of the jacket?
Response: As a precaution and to maximize reliability, RUS
borrowers must use heat or cold shrink sleeves accepted by RUS (Refer
to items U hf and U hy in RUS Information Publication 202-1, List of
Materials Acceptable for Use on Systems of RUS Electrification
Borrowers).
(6) Section 14.4: RUS may want to consider dead front treatment of
this type transformer.
Response: RUS does not accept enclosures such as sectionalizers and
transformers unless they are of the dead front design.
(7) Section 25.1: Is it the intention to require testing or to
recommend testing that would be helpful?
Response: Bulletin 1728F-806 requires that conductor continuity
tests be conducted while it recommends that borrowers perform the high
potential test. The term ``shall'' has been changed to ``should'' for
the high potential test in section 25.1.b.
(8) Drawing UC2-2: Cutouts placed on the opposite side of the
crossarm would not expel fuse material on the terminations.
Response: RUS agrees and has made the modifications to accommodate
the suggested comment.
(9) Drawing UC5 and UC6: Clarify underground source/or reverse
switch. Also, jumpers from switch to overhead lines would not route to
the pole like a ground wire. End view of equipment bracket needs to
clarify separate phase connections; may need to exaggerate center phase
offset.
Response: The center primary conductor has been redrawn to depict a
primary conductor not a ground wire. The devices are in line when seen
from the sideview.
(10) Drawing UG7: Position of primary bushings not typical of
transformer supplied.
Response: RUS is more concerned with detailing how the electrical
connections should be completed. The philosophy of electrical
connections is important because the bushing layout design may change
from time to time. The drawing shown depicts an ANSI Type I
transformer. As a result of this connection, the neutral has been moved
to the bottom bushing.
(11) Drawings UJ1 and UJ2: Dead front requirement is not clear.
Response: These drawings apply to secondary connector blocks. Dead
front construction does not apply here. However, to minimize chances
for confusion, a note stating ``insulated cover removed'' has been
added to the drawings.
(12) Drawing UK6: Pentahead bolts on a below grade enclosure would
seem unnecessary.
Response: Public access and safety concerns for accessible
underground facilities are no different than above grade construction.
(13) Sections 10 and 11 Method of Calculating Minimum Conduit Size
and Installation in Conduit or Duct: Should RUS provide an explanation
of why these two sections were deleted and where a borrower can find
information on the installation of wire in conduit?
Response: The previous RUS published method of calculating conduit
size is not the best available method. RUS recommends that borrowers
contact cable and conduit manufacturers for design and installation
instructions.
(14) Drawing UG9A: Should this drawing be retained. It may be
useful, as a reference, when retiring this unit from the field.
Response: This construction standard is no longer recommended and
has been removed from Bulletin 1728F-806. RUS suggests borrowers refer
to RUS Bulletin 1767B-2 for reference of retirement units.
(15) In general, the print size should be increased, especially
item letters attached to drawings. It's easy to confuse e and c or a
and o.
Response: The font sizes have been increased.
(16) On all terminal drawings, delete reference to parallel
arresters. Those haven't been used since MOV arresters came into being
in 1982-83. Maybe RUS should reinforce use of MOV's on underground in
the material list under Uae surge arrester--MOV only.
Response: RUS agrees and has removed all notes referring to
parallel arresters as they are no longer applicable to this RUS
construction standard.
(17) Do not specify elbows as part of transformer drawings to be
consistent with UM3 and UM33 drawings. If RUS would like to specify,
UG7 needs 2 elbows not 1.
Response: RUS agrees to specify two elbows on drawing UG7 to be
consistent with other drawings.
(18) On UM3-14 delete UM3-15 and UM3-16. Only difference between -
14 and -16 is the pad, which is spaced separately. -15 is obsolete.
Change drawing to UM3. Redraw UM3-14 now as UM3 and show a 3-point
junction to reflect the real world way the inside of the cabinet would
look. What's illustrated doesn't exist.
Response: Drawings UM3-15 and UM3-16 are obsolete and have been
removed. For the ground connections to the enclosures, the ground wires
are hidden. RUS changed the mounting arrangement to reflect field
application.
(19) In drawing UX4, since we show loops in ground rod connections
for transformers and pad mount equipment, shouldn't there be 2
connections to the ground rod?
Response: Two connections in an enclosure are required to provide
additional mechanical protection and to complete the ground loop.
Connections to ground rods should be isolated and, mechanically, should
not be disturbed. Therefore, dual connections to the ground rods are
not needed.
(20) On UX11 drawing, the note about 3 ft. max. is not needed. This
connection has lead length of effectively 0 feet. The note is
misapplied.
[[Page 34045]]
Response: The note has been removed for the reasons presented in
this comment.
(21) Section 18: There is no reference to concrete vaults and their
associated covers.
Response: Due to the wide variation of concrete vaults available,
RUS does not have specific requirements for concrete vaults.
(22) Units UB1, UB3, UB2-1, UC2-1: The jumper between the top of
the terminator and the top of the arrester crosses over the top of the
crossarm. This will undoubtedly kill lots of birds.
Response: Due to limitations of what and how we can show details on
drawings, jumpers in drawings are for demonstration purpose and may not
reflect actual field installation. Usually raptors choose the highest
point to perch in search of prey and rest. On the structure referred to
in this comment, most raptors can be expected to perch on the pole top
rather than the lower crossarm. However, in locations where there is a
possibility that raptors may use the lower crossarm, borrowers may
utilize insulated jumper wires for the connection cited by the
commentor.
(23) Drawings UG17 and UG17B: Shows only one ground rod. Note that
UM 48-2 shows two (2) ground rods which will help get below 25 ohms.
Response: The ground rods on the drawings referred to by the
commentor are not part of the cited drawings as is intended by their
dotted appearance on these drawings. The ground rods are shown on these
drawings only for reference perspective purposes. Grounding is required
but for details on the grounding, borrowers would refer to the
applicable RUS standard drawings on which grounding and ground rod use
are included as part of the unit and included in the materials list.
The applicable grounding drawings include notes that advise borrowers
that depending on the condition and type of soil, installation of
multiple ground rods may be necessary to attain a desirable ground
resistance. These drawing notes also advise that, because use is site
specific, numbers and type of ground rods are to be specified
separately by the engineer.
(24) Drawings UM 3-44 and UM 3-45: Live bushing equipment in this
type of enclosure is not a good safety practice. Suggest it not be
allowed.
Response: The drawings were not shown as intended. As can be seen
from the material listings for ``be'' and ``el'', these items are to be
supplied with bushing wells and thus the drawings need to be shown
using elbows. The drawings were changed to agree with materials used.
(25) Drawing UM6 Page 5 of 8: In the Notes, items Uhf are referred
to for resealing concentric neutral wires. What are they?
Response: Item U hf is a cable sealing kit. A note has been added
to the drawing to better explain this item and its use. RUS accepted U
hf products of various manufacturers are included in RUS Informational
Publication 202-1, List of Materials Acceptable for Use on Systems of
RUS Electrification Borrowers.
(26) Drawing UA1--UC6: RUS Bulletin 50-6 recommends, p connectors
as required, where as, RUS Bulletin 50-3 required, p compression
connectors. It would be desirable to maintain a consistent standard in
the type of connector required in making the connection from the
primary neutral to the pole ground.
Response: RUS requires compression connectors be used for grounding
connections on underground construction. Many connector options may be
use for overhead connections where conditions will generally be less
adverse than underground construction. Compression connectors improve
the chances for more permanent connections in underground construction.
(27) Drawing UM48-2: This drawing previously required #2 copper for
the grounding wire. This requirement does not seem to be clearly
spelled out in the current drawing.
Response: The minimum size of grounding wire to use is specified in
the National Electrical Safety Code (NESC). As the size of grounding
wire required will vary, RUS no longer includes wire size in the
drawing and leaves determination and specification to the design
engineer. RUS does not object to using wire sizes which exceed the
minimum NESC requirements.
(28) Section 6.4 and 17.1: The two inches of sand is not
recommended by the cable manufacturers. Sand serves as a thermal
insulator and de-rates the cable ampacity. Also, for cable runs of a
\1/4\ mile or more, a potential galvanic action problem may be created
for grounding the cable as required by NESC.
Response: Normally, good soil removed during digging of a trench is
used as backfilling material. Sand is used as backfill in situations
where removed soil is not suitable backfill material and consists of
large rocks and/or sharp objects that could damage the buried cable.
Sand may not be the ideal substitute as backfilling material. However,
in most rural low load factor circuit use situations sand availability
and economic feasibility make it a choice backfilling substitute.
(29) Drawing UK5: Locking mechanism should have provisions for
company pad lock.
Response: NESC Rule 381G. requires enclosures to be either locked
or otherwise secure against unauthorized entry. RUS requires and
accepts enclosures that include the standard penta-head bolt, which
provides the NESC intended security. Borrowers wishing to also use
padlocking facilities in addition to having and using the required
penta-head bolt may do so.
(30) Can a note be included on some drawings (such as UB1 where the
neutral is so high) allowing the neutral to be lowered to get it down
out of the primary?
Response: The neutral may be moved as long as the resulting
installation meets proper clearances and does not violate safety codes.
(31) Several sections state that it is the responsibility of the
borrower to ensure that the Contractor and the Owner. Is the borrower
not the owner? Maybe this needs to be clarified.
Response: The commenter is correct in that the ``Owner'' and
``Borrower'' are generally the same entity. The ``Owner'' is the term
used in RUS standard contracts to refer to the RUS borrower that
executes the contract with the contractor. Borrower refers to a RUS
borrower that has obtained financing assistance from RUS and has
executed a loan contract with RUS. For accuracy purposes, specific
bulletin sections deliberately refer to the contract terminology noted.
(32) Several sections state that it is the responsibility of the
borrower to ensure. This needs to be changed to include the contractor
as well.
Response: RUS does not have a regulatory relationship that allows
establishment of requirements for contractors. Thus, RUS requires the
borrower to ensure that the contractor complies with contract
provisions. Borrowers are able to do so easily by use of RUS
construction contracts which both the borrower and the contractor sign.
RUS contracts make the design specification (RUS Bulletin 1728F-806 in
this case) an integral part of the contract under which the contractor
is contractually obligated to comply with the specification provisions.
(33) Section 17: Need to define what proper compaction is.
Response: Proper compaction provisions vary greatly and depend on
local conditions. Compaction provision should be established by the
borrower and completed in accordance with the borrower's satisfaction.
[[Page 34046]]
(34) Section 17.1: Is one inch too large for having in backfill?
Response: Backfill with pieces of less than one-inch (25
millimeter) size is recommended.
(35) Section 18.1: Gravel or sand is not needed under pads in all
cases. This should be optional.
Response: RUS agrees and the term ``shall'' has been changed to
``may.''
(36) Drawings UB2 and UC2: Why is the crossarm shown on a different
side of the pole on these two drawings as compared with UB1 and UC1?
Why are left side terminals and cutouts not out to end of arms to
balance construction?
Response: Drawings UB1 and UC1 detail construction utilizing
crossarm mounting arresters while drawings UB2 and UC2 detail
construction utilizing bracket mounting arresters. Brackets mount on
opposite sides of the pole to provide for accessibility and clearances.
Equipment and hardware on the structures have been redrawn to depict
balanced construction as suggested.
(37) Drawings UC5 and UC6: Intermediate arresters are shown (we
guess that is why they are so large). Most cooperatives use riser pole
arresters.
Response: We agree that the arrester size is confusing and revised
the drawings to depict pole arrester use.
(38) Drawings UG6, UG7, UG17, UG17-2 and UG17-3: No slack is shown
in primary cable. Most cooperatives loop the primary over from the
secondary side to give slack so that cables can be parked or switched.
Bulletin 50-6 showed the cable this way.
Response: We agree with the utility suggestion in this comment and
revised the drawing by adding a note to allow slack in the primary
cable installation.
(39) Drawing UG17: Requiring three phase switches as implied by
note 6 should be optional.
Response: Note 6 on Drawing UG17 advises that three phase switching
``should'' be installed where ferroresonance may occur. The note is
cautionary to help avoid equipment damage on three-phase installations
where ferroresonance is a possibility. Because the word ``should'' is
used and not ``must'', three-phase switching would not need to be
installed in situations where a borrower's engineer determined that
ferroresonance would not occur.
(40) Drawing UJ1: A note is needed on the drawing stating that the
connector blocks must be insulated to have a ``dead-front'' unit.
Response: These are drawings depicting various types of secondary
connector blocks. It is not the intent of the bulletin to show dead
front in this drawing. To help dispel possible confusion, the drawing
includes a note that states ``insulated covers are not shown''.
(41) Drawing UK6: If this handhole is metal, how is it to be
grounded? Sign should be a warning not danger.
Response: RUS accepted metal pedestals must have grounding lugs
available on the inside wall. A note has been added advising that all
pedestals shall be grounded in accordance with the NESC. The placement
of the safety sign has been relocated to the pedestal side (with the
penta-head bolt lock) that opens. Both DANGER and WARNING signs have
been added to the drawing's material listings. A WARNING sign should be
placed on the outside of the enclosure where there is a potential
hazard. A DANGER sign should be placed on the inside of the enclosure
where there is an imminent hazard.
(42) Drawing UM1-6C: Having three or four different size pads might
fit these size transformers better. Note #1 requires 4000# concrete,
but most use 3000# which would be adequate for this.
Response: RUS agrees and has amended Note 1 of the drawing to
specify the minimum at 3000 pounds per square inch (20 megapascals).
(43) Drawings UM3-44 and UM3-46: This is a dangerous installation
since it is not dead front. A bushing insert can be installed in the
recloser and then primary cable run to it to make everything deadfront.
Response: The drawings were not shown as intended. As can be seen
from the material listings for ``be'' and ``el'', these items are to be
supplied with bushing wells and thus the drawings needs to be shown
using elbows. The drawings were changed to agree with the materials
used.
(44) Drawing UM6-27: Needs to be omitted.
Response: RUS agrees and has deleted this obsolete drawing.
(45) Drawing UM8-2: Ground rod connector has to be above grade as
per code. Does the post need to be a minimum size, such as 4 x 4
inches?
Response: Section 250-52(c)(3) of the National Electrical Code
requires that the upper end of a driven ground rod be flush with or
below ground level unless the rod end and the grounding electrode
conductor attachment are protected against physical damage. The RUS
drawing shows the top of the rod well beneath grade to depict greater
protection for the rod end and the grounding attachment.
RUS has included a note to require a minimum post size of 4 inches
(10 centimeters) square or diameter.
(46) Drawing UM8-4: Why not show conduit coming in bottom of meter
base to eliminate the elbow?
Response: RUS agrees and has revised the drawing to show cable
entering from the base instead of from the side of the meter.
(47) Drawing UM8-6: Why cannot a meter be mounted to transformer?
Utilities do this all the time.
Response: RUS does not believe such installations to be prudent.
Mounting metering equipment onto the wall of padmounted transformers
will require some cutting and drilling which will expose untreated
transformer metal surfaces. These surfaces overtime will corrode
prematurely and may cause serious problems.
In addition, vibrations from the transformer may affect the meter
operation. Also, anytime a transformer is changed out, the meter has to
be changed as well.
(48) Drawing UM12: Should this sign meet ANSI Z535 standards also?
Would it be a Notice or a Warning or a Caution?
Response: RUS agrees there may be confusion with this drawing and
revised the drawing by adding the signal word ``WARNING'' to the label.
A note was also added requiring the sign to comply with ANSI Z535.
(49) Drawing UM26: Needs to be omitted. Nobody uses these anymore.
Response: RUS agrees that this drawing depicts outdated
construction and removed the drawing.
(50) Drawing UM48-3: Is anode needed for jacketed cable?
Response: The sacrificial anode (Item U si) shown as a hidden line
is optional. Some RUS borrowers prefer to install anodes at all ground
points because gophers might chew through the jacket and expose the
copper neutrals. The sacrificial anode will provide corrosion
protection to such exposed neutral wires preventing a loss of neutral
integrity.
(51) Drawing UX5: Need to show a minimum distance between ground
rods as are done on other drawings.
Response: RUS agrees and has revised the drawing to show a minimum
spacing of 6 ft. (1.8 m) between multiple ground rods. (As a general
rule, RUS recommends that separation of ground rods be no closer than
the length of the ground rods used. When rods are closer to one another
than their length they will magnetically influence one another and
degrade grounding effectiveness.) A note was also added to advise that
multiple rods may not fit inside the enclosure. Where spacing inside an
[[Page 34047]]
enclosure does not allow the 6 ft. (1.8 m) separation between multiple
ground rods, one rod is to be installed inside the enclosure and the
other outside. The ground loop has been redrawn to show a complete loop
with a conductor feed from the loop down to the ground rod.
(52) Drawing UM7-1: There is no minimum ground clearance shown on
any pole structures. If RUS does not want to show minimum clearances,
perhaps a note regarding the source for clearance information would be
in order.
Response: RUS agrees there is possible confusion here. Clearances
were omitted purposefully because alternative working methods may be
implemented along with appropriate alternative working clearances as a
means of providing safety. To allay concerns of this comment, RUS
revised the drawing by adding a note which states that clearances must
meet NESC requirements.
(53) Certain existing drawings (UC5) are a different design from
the proposed drawings. Certain materials used are different and the
specification will also have different record units.
Response: RUS agrees and has changed the drawing numbers to the
applicable drawings.
(54) When RUS changes a construction specification, maybe RUS
should add a suffix to indicate that change (example: UC5 change to
UC5A or UC5-1, or UC5-98)
Response: RUS agrees and has changed the drawing numbers to the
applicable drawings.
(55) Drawing UM48-2: The drawing shows the use of two ground rods
in the elevation view, however, the quantity of rods is left open in
the material list. I and a number of fellow workers and clients feel
that it would be helpful to add a note 3 stating that the quantity of
rods is to be determined by the specifier and that the use of two rods
rather than one at a multi-phase transformer or enclosure is not a
standard or a requirement by RUS.
Response: RUS agrees. Depending on the condition and type of soil,
installation of multiple ground rods may be necessary to attain a
desirable ground resistance. Thus, ground rods need to be specified
separately.
In response to this comment, RUS added the following note to the
drawing: ``The quantity of rods is to be determined by the specifier.
The use of two rods rather than one at a multi-phase transformer or
enclosure is not a standard or a requirement by RUS.''
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1728
Electric power, Incorporation by reference, Loan programs-energy,
Rural areas.
For reasons set out in the preamble, RUS is amending 7 CFR part
1728 as follows:
PART 1728--ELECTRIC STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR MATERIALS AND
CONSTRUCTION
1. The authority citation for part 1728 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 901 et seq., 1921 et seq., 6941 et seq.
2. Section 1728.97 is amended by revising paragraph (a) and by
adding, in numerical order, the entry for Bulletin 1728F-806 to
paragraph (b). The revision and addition read as follows:
Sec. 1728.97 Incorporation by reference of electric standards and
specifications.
(a) The following electric bulletins have been approved for
incorporation by reference by the Director of the Office of the Federal
Register. The bulletins containing construction standards (50-3 to 50-6
and 1728F-803 to 1728F-811), may be purchased from the Superintendent
of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.
The bulletins containing specifications for materials and equipment
(50-15 to 50-99 and 1728F-700) may be obtained from the Rural Utilities
Service, Program Development and Regulatory Analysis, Stop 1522, Room
4028-S, Washington, DC 20250-1522. The terms ``RUS form'', ``RUS
standard form'', ``RUS specification'', and ``RUS bulletin'' have the
same meanings as the terms ``REA form'', ``REA standard form'', ``REA
specification'', and ``REA bulletin'', respectively unless otherwise
indicated. The bulletins are available for inspection at the Office of
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 700,
Washington, DC. These materials are incorporated as they exist on the
date of the approval and a notice of any change in these materials will
be published in the Federal Register.
(b) * * *
Bulletin 1728F-806 (D-806), Specifications and Drawings for Underground
Electric Distribution, June 2000.
* * * * *
Dated: May 15, 2000.
Jill Long Thompson,
Under Secretary, Rural Development.
[FR Doc. 00-13293 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-15-P
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 2000/05/26 EST